Juan Pablo Paz vs Matei Victor Chelemen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Jul at 10:09 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Pablo Paz vs M. Victor Chelemen

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ROU
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Paz 1 - 0 Chelemen
They have played 2 sets in total, with Juan Pablo Paz winning 2 and Matei Victor Chelemen winning 0. The last match between Juan Pablo Paz and Matei Victor Chelemen was at the M25 Pitesti, 29-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Juan Pablo Paz getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Paz | 1 |
Chelemen | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Pitesti(07-29-25)
J. P. Paz vs M. V. Chelemen H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$2,105 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
58.27% (486-348) | Career Total W/L | 0.00% (0-2) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
8 | Titles | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. P. Paz vs M. V. Chelemen Match Preview:
- In recent months, Chelemen has not won any points on their second serve, while Paz has a strong 42.94% win rate. Could this be a deciding factor? Most likely, yes.
- Looking at return game stats, Chelemen has not secured any points from opponents' second serves, whereas Paz has achieved 45.82% success. For first serve returns, the figures are 0% for Chelemen and 30.45% for Paz.
- Under pressure, Chelemen has not saved any breakpoints recently, while Paz exhibits more resilience with a 50.98% save rate.
- In the past year, Chelemen has won none of their matches, contrasting with Paz's moderate success rate of 53.06%.
- Despite Chelemen's preferred surface being Hard, they haven't triumphed on it. Paz, on the other hand, excels on Clay with a 59% win rate.
- Both players have competed primarily at the Futures/Satellites/ITF level, with Chelemen not winning a single match, while Paz won 56.41% of their matches.
- Regarding opponent quality, Chelemen's opponents have an average rank of 863, while Paz has faced tougher competition, with an average opponent rank of 281.14.
- When matches extend to a deciding set, Chelemen has not won any in the last year, whereas Paz shows competitive strength with a 50% win rate.
- Chelemen's breakpoint conversion is at 0%, while Paz capitalizes effectively at 47.37%, indicating a potential edge in pressure situations.
Editorial Prediction (July 29, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match presents a stark contrast between Chelemen and Paz based on their recent performances and historical data. Chelemen's consistent inability to win points on second serves, breakpoints, and return games indicates significant struggles when under pressure.
On the other hand, Paz's ability to successfully win points on crucial occasions, especially in pressure situations, illustrates their strength in overcoming challenges. Their past success on various surfaces, combined with a more competitive player history, further sets Paz apart.
Given the substantial statistical differences, Paz's superior form and recent trends in performance make them the more likely candidate to secure victory in this match.
Juan Pablo Paz vs Matei Victor Chelemen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. P. Paz vs M. V. Chelemen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 7 |
5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
1:40:54 | Average Match Time | 1:40:54 |
59% (36/61) | 1st Serve % | 60% (38/63) |
61% (22/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (20/38) |
68% (17/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (10/25) |
71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
52% (33/63) | Return Points Win % | 36% (22/61) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. P. Paz Recent Matches Played
M. V. Chelemen Recent Matches Played

J. P. Paz vs M. V. Chelemen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.27% (486/348) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
57.36% (1064/791) | Sets Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/4) |
53.65% (8959/7740) | Games Win/Loss | 32.43% (12/25) |
43.33% (13/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
59.20% (473/326) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
0.00% (0/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
1594 | Aces Total | 0 |
0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
1444 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
1:17:11 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
513.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 807 |
62% (24110/39115) | 1st Serve % | 60% (38/63) |
67% (16125/24110) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (20/38) |
50% (7552/15002) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (10/25) |
46% (2061/4504) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
42% (16805/39668) | Return Points Win % | 36% (22/61) |
25.00% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
48.41% (76/81) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
60.77% (409/264) | Futures W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
58% (471/807) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
20% (1/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
50% (87/174) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
50% (102/205) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
88% (501/439) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
12% (501/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
14% (333/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |